From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com (Ian Campbell) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:40:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] arm/arm64: Detect Xen support earlier In-Reply-To: <54E481D6.2080908@linaro.org> References: <1423722898-16110-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1424259059.27775.17.camel@citrix.com> <54E47CBD.7060002@linaro.org> <1424260988.27775.26.camel@citrix.com> <54E481D6.2080908@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1424266806.27775.55.camel@citrix.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 12:13 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > On 18/02/2015 12:03, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:51 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > >> Hi Ian, > >> > >> On 18/02/2015 11:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 06:34 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> This small patch series move the detection of running on Xen earlier. This is > >>>> required in order to support earlyprintk via Xen and selecting the preferred > >>>> console. > >>> > >>> Thanks for doing this, having all of the init done in an initcall (even > >>> a relatively early one) has been a niggle I've wanted address for ages, > >>> for exactly earlyprintk and preferred console reasons. > >>> > >>> I had a very minor comment on #1 but nonetheless both patches: > >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell > >> > >> Can I keep you ack on the first one with the __read_mostly dropped? > > > > Sure. > > > > BTW, when reposting you might want to CC the arch/arm* maintainers on > > this intro mail as well as just the second patch. > > Ok. I wasn't sure if this patches should go via the Xen tree or ARM one. That's a question for all relevant maintainers to discuss -- and replies to the 0/N mail is a good place to do that. I suggest you explicitly ask the question in the intro next time around. Ian.