From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] xen/arm: Resync the SMMU driver with the Linux one Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1424442437.30924.266.camel@citrix.com> References: <1422643768-23614-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1424441710.30924.263.camel@citrix.com> <54E7425D.4090705@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YOoY6-0008Ou-9O for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54E7425D.4090705@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 14:19 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > For v4 if you are able to shuffle some of the (almost-)acked helper > > stuff (e.g. #6, #7, #8 here) to the front then those can likely be > > applied straight away too. > > I could be able to move #6 before, but the other it would prefer to avoid. > > I have decided to revert the SMMU before #6 to avoid modifying the SMMU > drivers. > > I agree that makes "more" patch without the SMMU support but it's the > resulting patch are more cleaner. It's up to you either way. Ian