From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755487AbbBUB7m (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:59:42 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0159.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.159]:59850 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754985AbbBUB7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:59:41 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:968:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3872:4321:4605:5007:6248:6261:7514:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: metal07_8e6cc7f39d42e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1986 Message-ID: <1424483977.18211.23.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Staging: rtl8192u: r819xU_firmware: added space after comma From: Joe Perches To: Tolga Ceylan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Roxana Blaj , Ana Rey , Rui Miguel Silva , Chaitra Ramaiah , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry Finger Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:59:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1424411651-15978-1-git-send-email-tolga.ceylan@gmail.com> <1424411651-15978-4-git-send-email-tolga.ceylan@gmail.com> <1424417451.18211.6.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:31 -0800, Tolga Ceylan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Tolga Ceylan wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > >> Might as well remove the unnecessary cast too: > >> memcpy(skb->cb, &dev, sizeof(dev)); > >> but it might be better to avoid the memcpy and use an assign > >> *(struct net_device *)skb->cb = dev; [] > Should I sent a new set of patches (including memcpy change)? > Or reply to the series with a single memcpy change patch? Let Larry Finger decide if he wants the patches at all first.