From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/24] xl: Add new option dtdev Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:44:05 +0000 Message-ID: <1424702645.27930.127.camel@citrix.com> References: <1421159133-31526-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1421159133-31526-25-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <54CA2317.7030000@linaro.org> <54CA3AEF.2010800@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YPuFs-0004s4-OR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:45:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:06 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > I don't think it is necessary to have two separate patches, but let's > see what the libxl maintainers have to say. For large changes having the split between introducing libxl side and then using it can be useful, but this change is so small I really don't think it matters if it is 1 or 2 patches, as long as the series bisects. Given that it is written as two patches now I see no compelling reason to change it. Ian.