All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:45:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424727906-4460-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

Ensure that cpus specified with the isolcpus= boot commandline
option stay outside of the load balancing in the kernel scheduler.

Operations like load balancing can introduce unwanted latencies,
which is exactly what the isolcpus= commandline is there to prevent.

Previously, simply creating a new cpuset, without even touching the
cpuset.cpus field inside the new cpuset, would undo the effects of
isolcpus=, by creating a scheduler domain spanning the whole system,
and setting up load balancing inside that domain. The cpuset root
cpuset.cpus file is read-only, so there was not even a way to undo
that effect.

This does not impact the majority of cpusets users, since isolcpus=
is a fairly specialized feature used for realtime purposes.


             reply	other threads:[~2015-02-23 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-23 21:45 riel [this message]
2015-02-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-02-25  2:10   ` David Rientjes
2015-02-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
     [not found]   ` <1424727906-4460-3-git-send-email-riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-25  2:15     ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25  2:15       ` David Rientjes
     [not found]       ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502241811020.19547-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-25  3:30         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-25  3:30           ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-24  2:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus Mike Galbraith
2015-02-24 14:13   ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-24 14:22     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-02-24 14:29     ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1424727906-4460-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.