From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] xen/arm: Add support for DTBs with strange names of Hip04 GICv2 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:13:02 +0000 Message-ID: <1424794382.27930.372.camel@citrix.com> References: <8fcf574cc2d3201cb20143192a6a890585b7b63c.1424425794.git.frediano.ziglio@huawei.com> <54EC887C.3080805@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54EC887C.3080805@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: Frediano Ziglio , Tim Deegan , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Stefano Stabellini , zoltan.kiss@huawei.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:19 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Frediano, > > On 20/02/15 09:56, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > This name can appear in some Linux kernel repos. Not very fortunate, > > but to avoid others spending an hour to spot that few characters > > difference it worth to work around it. > > As Zoltan said on a previous mail [1], this is only used on your > internal kernel. > > Furthermore, as the bindings is not official, nothing prevent someone to > re-use the bindings for another purpose (such as GICv3 on hisilicon). > > Xen upstream aims to support only official bindings for a this reason. > So I don't think we should take this patch. Neither do I. Nacked-by: Ian Campbell . If/when these bindings are described in the official bindings document then please let us know. Ian.