From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 3/8] emails: honour
	OSSTEST_EMAIL_SUBJECT_PREFIX
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:31:13 +0000
Message-ID: <1425029473.14641.111.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1424869277-16764-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1424869277-16764-4-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1424870672.20243.98.camel@citrix.com>
	<21743.23437.578256.663822@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YRHIF-0008WH-9F
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:33:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <21743.23437.578256.663822@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 17:44 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 3/8] emails: honour OSSTEST_EMAIL_SUBJECT_PREFIX"):
> > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 13:01 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This is prefixed before the other computed prefixes.  It makes it
> > > easier to distinguish an adhoc cr-daily-branch test runs for a real
> > > branch.
> > 
> > Do they not already get "adhoc" in the $subject? i.e. my commissioning
> > runs for the new arm create (following README.dev procedure) resulted in
> > mails with:
> > 
> > [adhoc test] 34418: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
> > 
> > (IOW it seems $branch is replaced by adhoc somewhere along the say)
> 
> That happens if you use mg-execute-flight.  If you let cr-daily-branch
> run the flight for you, it uses the standard email stuff.

Ah, OK, I didn't realise there was a difference.

So Ack to this and the next patch which I didn't ack for similar
reasons. (I think that makes the whole series acked, FWIW)

> 
> Ian.