From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: "julien.grall@linaro.org" <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@citrix.com>,
"JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: widen NUMA nodes to be allocated from
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:55:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425045335.10194.76.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F0734F.4020802@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:38 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >>
> > Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> >
> > One question (a genuine one, i.e., I'm really not sure what I'm saying
> > is correct).
> >
> > After this series, vcpu_to_node() (defined in xen/include/xen/numa.h) is
> > left with only one use, in xen/arch/arm/domain.c, besides of course
> > being used to implement domain_to_node() (still in
> > xen/include/xen/numa.h).
> >
> > So, provided ARM people (and I'm Cc-ing them) can get rid of that, can
> > that macro be removed all together, and domain_to_node(d) be defined
> > after d->node_affinity... something like:
> Given the changes made by Jan on x86, I think we could replace
> vcpu_to_node by MEMF_no_owner.
>
I expected this to be the case. Happy to hear it is! :-)
> FWIW, we don't have any NUMA support on ARM currently.
>
I know.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 13:44 [PATCH 0/5] (not just)x86/Dom0: NUMA related adjustments Jan Beulich
2015-02-26 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: allow specifying the NUMA nodes Dom0 should run on Jan Beulich
2015-02-26 17:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 8:46 ` Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 10:04 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 14:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 15:04 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-03 10:51 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-04 10:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-06 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-06 10:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-06 11:33 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-06 13:26 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-06 11:49 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-03 9:59 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-05 16:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-05 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-05 17:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-06 9:19 ` [PATCH 1/5 v2] " Jan Beulich
2015-03-06 10:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-06 16:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-02-26 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] allow domain heap allocations to specify more than one NUMA node Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 11:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-02 17:12 ` Ian Campbell
2015-03-03 7:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-05 16:18 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-02-26 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: widen NUMA nodes to be allocated from Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 13:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 13:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 14:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 13:38 ` Julien Grall
2015-02-27 13:55 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-02-27 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-02-27 13:46 ` Ian Campbell
2015-02-27 14:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-02-27 14:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-05 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-02-26 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] VT-d: " Jan Beulich
2015-03-05 17:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-09 3:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-02-26 13:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] AMD IOMMU: " Jan Beulich
2015-03-05 17:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-06 7:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-06 12:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-09 15:42 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-03-09 17:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-09 19:02 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-03-10 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-10 13:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-02-27 10:04 ` [PATCH 0/5] (not just)x86/Dom0: NUMA related adjustments Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425045335.10194.76.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.