From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] xen/arm: Add ITS support Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:53:18 +0000 Message-ID: <1425307998.21151.74.camel@citrix.com> References: <1425299435-3278-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1425299435-3278-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, vijaya.kumar@caviumnetworks.com, julien.grall@linaro.org, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 18:00 +0530, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote: > From: Vijaya Kumar K > > Add ITS support for arm. Thanks. I think this is the last major bit of stuff from your current development tree, is that right? There's quite a few series out there right now from you guys, with quite a number of patches in each, so I think we need to prioritise the order we deal with them. I am intending to go through them in the following order: * Basic platform support code * PCI support * ITS support * Other new work (e.g. NUMA) Does that ordering suit your plans? I think we don't want to build up too much of a backlog so it would be good to put an emphasis on addressing comments & resending stuff nearer the top of the list first. (With that in mind I think the basic platform device was almost there but needed a couple of minor things addressing in one patch). Cheers, Ian.