From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] allow domain heap allocations to
 specify more than one NUMA node
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:12:40 +0000
Message-ID: <1425316360.24959.25.camel@citrix.com>
References: <54EF315902000078000640FF@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<54EF337C0200007800064140@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YSU0r-0004ir-H6
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:20:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <54EF337C0200007800064140@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 13:53 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... using struct domain as a container for passing the respective
> affinity mask: Quite a number of allocations are domain specific, yet
> not to be accounted for that domain. Introduce a flag suppressing the
> accounting altogether (i.e. going beyond MEMF_no_refcount) and use it
> right away in common code (x86 and IOMMU code will get adjusted
> subsequently).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Does this patch constitute all the "not just"(x86) from the initial
mail? I'll assume so unless I hear otherwise.