From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] xen/arm: Add ITS support Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:39:10 +0000 Message-ID: <1425317950.24959.41.camel@citrix.com> References: <1425299435-3278-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1425307998.21151.74.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1425307998.21151.74.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, vijaya.kumar@caviumnetworks.com, julien.grall@linaro.org, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Forgot one series (albeit of a single patch): On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 14:53 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > There's quite a few series out there right now from you guys, with quite > a number of patches in each, so I think we need to prioritise the order > we deal with them. > > I am intending to go through them in the following order: > * Basic platform support code * VMAP PTE present fix > * PCI support > * ITS support > * Other new work (e.g. NUMA) > > Does that ordering suit your plans? > > I think we don't want to build up too much of a backlog so it would be > good to put an emphasis on addressing comments & resending stuff nearer > the top of the list first. > > (With that in mind I think the basic platform device was almost there > but needed a couple of minor things addressing in one patch). > > Cheers, > Ian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel