From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial/8250_dw: use platform_get_irq() instead of platform_get_resource() Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:59:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1425398374.14897.155.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1425395474-6762-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <1425396362.14897.143.camel@linux.intel.com> <1425396820.17965.16.camel@synopsys.com> <1425397427.14897.149.camel@linux.intel.com> <1425397657.17965.28.camel@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1425397657.17965.28.camel@synopsys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Brodkin Cc: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "alan@linux.intel.com" List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 15:47 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > For example it was useful for me when debugging stacked interrupt > > > controllers setup - I got explicitly notified why this particular device > > > failed on probe. > > > > There are so many device drivers which prints similar message that you > > would consider to make a separate patch to platform.c code to do that > > stuff there once for all. > Then we may want to do another massive clean-up because there're lots of > other drivers that have this message in some form :) Yeah, you may do that and it will be (by my opinion) more useful than introducing one more place with the duplicate message. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy