From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: gic: Correctly check if an IRQ is valid in gic_interrupt Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:28:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1425576504.25940.290.camel@citrix.com> References: <1425400576-14771-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZm9-0007VQ-LC for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:41:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1425400576-14771-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 16:36 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > The IRQ 1020 is reserved for special purpose, so the check should be > "irq < 1020" rather than "irq < 1021". > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked + applied, thanks.