From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: stubdom vtpm build failure in staging Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:51:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1426071069.21353.169.camel@citrix.com> References: <20150128150850.GA4285@aepfle.de> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E87DF4A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20150211152040.GA29204@aepfle.de> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E89554A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E8955D7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <54DCE58D.5040102@citrix.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E895E94@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1424872459.20243.116.camel@citrix.com> <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E89D840@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <945CA011AD5F084CBEA3E851C0AB28890E89D840@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Xu, Quan" Cc: Olaf Hering , Wei Liu , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Daniel De Graaf List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 15:07 +0000, Xu, Quan wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campbell@citrix.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:54 PM > > To: Xu, Quan > > Cc: Andrew Cooper; Olaf Hering; Daniel De Graaf; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] stubdom vtpm build failure in staging > > > > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 02:07 +0000, Xu, Quan wrote: > > > > > I try to redefine tpm2_types.h, deleting 'UINT16, UINT32 ..' and > > > changing 'TPM_HANDLE ...' to ' TPM2_HANDLE ..', Or, could you give some > > advice? Thanks. > > > > Perhaps make stubdom/vtpmmgr/types.h with these and use it for both? > > Agree, I will try it. I came back to office today. Still no news on this? I see you've already sent out a bunch more vtpm features, FTR I shan't be considering them until this issue with the previous bunch of stuff is resolved. Regressions should take priority over new stuff. In fact I'm considering reverting the original patch which caused this build failure. Ian.