From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core
 code
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:26:26 +0000
Message-ID: <1426512378.32500.32.camel@citrix.com>
References: <20150313181109.GA3179@gmail.com> <55032C85.6090805@citrix.com>
	<550336EE.60909@eu.citrix.com>
	<5506DF40020000780006A407@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5506D1E1.8050404@eu.citrix.com>
	<5506E11F020000780006A426@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2272267560886446699=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5506E11F020000780006A426@mail.emea.novell.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>, "uma.sharma523@gmail.com" <uma.sharma523@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============2272267560886446699==
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zR0BmHY3nJrHFW5QE74d"

--=-zR0BmHY3nJrHFW5QE74d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:56 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.15 at 13:51, <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 03/16/2015 12:48 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> =20
> >> Them returning garbage isn't what needs fixing. Instead the code
> >> here should use a different condition to check whether this is the
> >> boot CPU (e.g. looking at system_state). And that can very well be
> >> done directly in this patch.
> >=20
> > What do you suggest, then?
>=20
> My preferred solution would be, as said, to leverage system_state.
> Provided the state to look for is consistent between x86 and ARM.
>=20
Ok, I'll look into using that.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=-zR0BmHY3nJrHFW5QE74d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlUG2fwACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSZRgCfSxeqe1flz9binn4LeGvbcj+f
6lMAn1aOAqhArNtP6Zmov6cxGiX+o9RW
=qQ+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-zR0BmHY3nJrHFW5QE74d--


--===============2272267560886446699==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============2272267560886446699==--