From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Mention a common pitfall in ballooning Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:57:05 +0000 Message-ID: <1426852625.21742.154.camel@citrix.com> References: <1426784959-15976-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1426784959-15976-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson , Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:09 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > Several users have reported that their available free memory in the > guest when they used maxmem >> memory was much smaller than when > maxmem == memory. This is the unavoidable consequence of how > ballooning works, but it's not something users expect. > > Warn them of this effect in the place we tell them how to make it > happen, so they aren't surprised. > > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap acked + applied, thanks.