From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:43:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1427190204.21742.312.camel@citrix.com> References: <86C3224E41A7434B904EC364302132D80E478552@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1426854029.21742.169.camel@citrix.com> <9E79D1C9A97CFD4097BCE431828FDD31B6E9AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1427104190.10125.8.camel@citrix.com> <9E79D1C9A97CFD4097BCE431828FDD31B6F902@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9E79D1C9A97CFD4097BCE431828FDD31B6F902@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Hu, Robert" Cc: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" , "Pang, LongtaoX" , "Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:25 +0000, Hu, Robert wrote: > Though no harm as far as I see now, I cannot forcast any harm in the > future. Anyway, this 'nestedhvm' is for a nested usage. Better to enable > it when we are actually going enable a nested environment. > Practically, we can do it in either way. and the first is actually easier to do. One good thing about just enabling it from the start is that we get some testing of normal guest installation while nestedhvm happens to be installed, which might help catch regressions. Ian.