From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 36622: regressions - FAIL Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:25:42 +0000 Message-ID: <1427275542.10784.20.camel@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "xen.org" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 19:13 +0000, xen.org wrote: > flight 36622 xen-unstable real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/36622/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > build-armhf 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 36514 Known and fixed in staging. > test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 13 rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat fail REGR. vs. 36514 This is a bit concerning, the repeat was supposed to catch the heisenbug more reliably. 36514 did indeed pass buit on this occasion it failed after 38 iterations. Shall we bump it to 100 iterations, and force push xen-unstable once this is the only remaining issue? 50 iterations took 107 seconds in 36514, so going to 100 or even higher shouldn't be too much trouble. Ian.