From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Arrange for core dumps to be placed in /var/core and collect them Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:30:03 +0000 Message-ID: <1427301003.10784.94.camel@citrix.com> References: <1425915623-14878-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <21777.23376.332679.268338@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1427201206.21742.389.camel@citrix.com> <21777.44652.634423.829345@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1427276450.10784.25.camel@citrix.com> <21778.57283.567699.318374@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21778.57283.567699.318374@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 16:18 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Arrange for core dumps to be placed in /var/core and collect them"): > > Do you have any thoughts on how to best universally arrange for the > > rlimits to be increased? Probably inserting a ulimit call into the > > libvirt initscript would be an easy first step, and since that's the > > thing we most often see crashing it seems. I'll send such a patch > > shortly. > > Maybe pam ? Yes, I think that's what my subsequent patch to configure via /etc/security/limits.d has achived. Ian.