From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] xen: arm: drop cache maintenance
 by set/way trap handling
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:15:55 +0100
Message-ID: <1427721355.13935.292.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1427713930.13935.287.camel@citrix.com>
	<1427713955-15657-8-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
	<55194179.10206@linaro.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <55194179.10206@linaro.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 13:28 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> On 30/03/15 12:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > We do not set HCR_EL2.TSW so we will never see these.
> > 
> > This is undoubtedly wrong, but for now remove the dead code.
> 
> Would it be better to trap and ignore them?

Yes, but this patch retains the status quo (while removing a thing to
think about in later patches). Doing something better is on my todo list
(as I said in the cover letter).

> Even though it wouldn't be entirely correct, it would be better than
> letting the guest using it.