From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/33] xen/arm: Add support for non-PCI passthrough Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:57:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1427803026.2115.111.camel@citrix.com> References: <1426793399-6283-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YcunE-0006MD-MQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:57:16 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1426793399-6283-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com, tim@xen.org, robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, Josh.Whitehead@dornerworks.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, andrii.tseglytskyi@globallogic.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of the series you think it would be sensible to apply now? If there are any acked bits which follow unacked bits but which are independent then let me know and I'll see if they can be applied. Ian.