From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/33] xen/arm: Add support for non-PCI passthrough Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:22:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1427808128.2115.130.camel@citrix.com> References: <1426793399-6283-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1427803026.2115.111.camel@citrix.com> <551A9C2B.9050800@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycw7R-00057H-2m for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:22:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: <551A9C2B.9050800@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:07 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and > > could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of > > the series you think it would be sensible to apply now? > > > > If there are any acked bits which follow unacked bits but which are > > independent then let me know and I'll see if they can be applied. > > Patch up to #15 (except #7 which miss an ack from Jan) can be pushed. > > Although some of them contains nits. If it convenient for you, I can > resend the series with the nits fixed and patch sorted in order to apply > the first part. That would be super, thanks. Ian.