From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:25:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1428158.DdRrRkV3Fx@flatron> References: <1368916627-23139-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <2600203.AqDGG2pvxF@flatron> <15e501ce688c$e01fbe90$a05f3bb0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:61475 "EHLO mail-ee0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab3FMXZ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:25:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <15e501ce688c$e01fbe90$a05f3bb0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Sylwester Nawrocki' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner=27?= , 'Wim Van Sebroeck' , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, jhbird.choi@samsung.com On Friday 14 of June 2013 08:22:30 Kukjin Kim wrote: > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > > Hi, > > > > > > > Kukjin, since it has been already tested on s3c24xx and > > > > > > s3c64xx > > > > > > and nobody seems to care about s5p64x0 and s5pc100 (although I > > > > > > don't see a reason why these patches should break them), could > > > > > > we > > > > > > have this series applied?> > > > > > > > > > > > OK, let me test this series on the smdk64x0 then, will apply. > > > > > > > > > > If any problems, let you know. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your gentle reminder. > > > > > > > > Thank you for handling this. I have a lot of patches for S3C64xx > > > > depending on this series queued in my private tree and it would be > > > > really nice if I could finally get them merged for 3.11. > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Seems like this series got lost in action, as I don't see it in your > > tree. Is there any problem with it? > > This series should be in my local and I didn't finish test something > yet. So I didn't push yet but it should be done in this weekend. > Anyway, sorry for late. If you have any further series based on this, > please go ahead. OK, no problem. Just wanted to know what happened (some errors or other problems), since you said that you applied it, but I couldn't find it in your tree. Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:25:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up In-Reply-To: <15e501ce688c$e01fbe90$a05f3bb0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1368916627-23139-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <2600203.AqDGG2pvxF@flatron> <15e501ce688c$e01fbe90$a05f3bb0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1428158.DdRrRkV3Fx@flatron> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 14 of June 2013 08:22:30 Kukjin Kim wrote: > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > > Hi, > > > > > > > Kukjin, since it has been already tested on s3c24xx and > > > > > > s3c64xx > > > > > > and nobody seems to care about s5p64x0 and s5pc100 (although I > > > > > > don't see a reason why these patches should break them), could > > > > > > we > > > > > > have this series applied?> > > > > > > > > > > > OK, let me test this series on the smdk64x0 then, will apply. > > > > > > > > > > If any problems, let you know. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your gentle reminder. > > > > > > > > Thank you for handling this. I have a lot of patches for S3C64xx > > > > depending on this series queued in my private tree and it would be > > > > really nice if I could finally get them merged for 3.11. > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Seems like this series got lost in action, as I don't see it in your > > tree. Is there any problem with it? > > This series should be in my local and I didn't finish test something > yet. So I didn't push yet but it should be done in this weekend. > Anyway, sorry for late. If you have any further series based on this, > please go ahead. OK, no problem. Just wanted to know what happened (some errors or other problems), since you said that you applied it, but I couldn't find it in your tree. Best regards, Tomasz