diff for duplicates of <1428635033.1554.49.camel@neuling.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7b769bc..dce71fc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 18:20 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>> which can be viewed or set from the user space through PTRACE_GETREGS > >>> PTRACE_SETREGS call is it's lower 32 bits only. Either we can club > >>> the upper 32 bits of MSR as part of one of the ELF core notes we are -> >>> adding in the patch series or we can create one more separate ELF cor= -e +> >>> adding in the patch series or we can create one more separate ELF core > >>> note for that purpose. Let me know your opinion on this. > >> > >> I'm not sure I understand this. I thought we had the following: @@ -31,10 +30,10 @@ e > >> 64-bit. > >> > >> Is this not correct? -> >=20 +> > > > I think you're correct. We should be right. I'd forgotten about the > > GET/SETREGS64 interfaces. ->=20 +> > In that case, is the patch series complete and okay ? Is there any thing > else we need to verify other than waiting for the GDB test results which > Edjunior has been working on. But I am not aware of the status on the GDB @@ -44,12 +43,12 @@ I think we are good. Mikey ->=20 +> > Edjunior, ->=20 +> > Do you have any updates ? ->=20 +> > Regards > Anshuman ->=20 ->=20 +> +> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index b5494a2..9baedc0 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -20,24 +20,24 @@ "Subject\0Re: [V6,1/9] elf: Add new powerpc specifc core note sections\0" "Date\0Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:03:53 +1000\0" "To\0Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Cc\0james.hogan@imgtec.com" + "Cc\0Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>" + shuahkh@osg.samsung.com + james.hogan@imgtec.com avagin@openvz.org Paul.Clothier@imgtec.com - linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org peterz@infradead.org palves@redhat.com - davem@davemloft.net - shuahkh@osg.samsung.com - akpm@linux-foundation.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> dhowells@redhat.com - Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com> + linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org kirjanov@gmail.com + tglx@linutronix.de oleg@redhat.com davej@redhat.com - tglx@linutronix.de + akpm@linux-foundation.org sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com - Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> + davem@davemloft.net " sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" @@ -55,8 +55,7 @@ "> >>> which can be viewed or set from the user space through PTRACE_GETREGS\n" "> >>> PTRACE_SETREGS call is it's lower 32 bits only. Either we can club\n" "> >>> the upper 32 bits of MSR as part of one of the ELF core notes we are\n" - "> >>> adding in the patch series or we can create one more separate ELF cor=\n" - "e\n" + "> >>> adding in the patch series or we can create one more separate ELF core\n" "> >>> note for that purpose. Let me know your opinion on this.\n" "> >>\n" "> >> I'm not sure I understand this. I thought we had the following:\n" @@ -74,10 +73,10 @@ "> >> 64-bit.\n" "> >>\n" "> >> Is this not correct?\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > I think you're correct. We should be right. I'd forgotten about the\n" "> > GET/SETREGS64 interfaces.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> In that case, is the patch series complete and okay ? Is there any thing\n" "> else we need to verify other than waiting for the GDB test results which\n" "> Edjunior has been working on. But I am not aware of the status on the GDB\n" @@ -87,14 +86,14 @@ "\n" "Mikey\n" "\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Edjunior,\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Do you have any updates ?\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Regards\n" "> Anshuman\n" - ">=20\n" - >=20 + "> \n" + > -1bc665d8ebd2b38cf5d61a584890a3d0161eba750997689675f65ec0ba26f3fb +f87028dddd26a495b89334c41f31b175a445a61e6cb6f125b4179fe86bbed378
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.