From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Add core.sh and wrapper function
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:55:21 +0100
Message-ID: <1429019721.15516.59.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1428607792-13418-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
	<1428607792-13418-2-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1504101154020.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<552B9D71.1020702@eu.citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1504131655270.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504131655270.7690@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 17:13 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I think it might be OK to have something like 5) just for the command
> line parsing in raise, for the sake of giving more flexibility to the
> user. Also it would be confined to one specific call site. But I am
> uncertain that the pros outweigh the cons in this case.

I've only glanced at it, but isn't this largely replicating getopt(1)?
Perhaps without requiring -- on the options, but having the -- is more
conventional I think.

Ian.