From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] Mem_access for ARM Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:04:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1429110275.15516.320.camel@citrix.com> References: <1427407531-31694-1-git-send-email-tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> <1429104979.15516.290.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tamas K Lengyel Cc: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Tim Deegan , Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 16:47 +0200, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ian Campbell > wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 23:05 +0100, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > The ARM virtualization extension provides 2-stage paging, a > similar mechanisms > > to Intel's EPT, which can be used to trace the memory > accesses performed by > > the guest systems. This series sets up the necessary > infrastructure in the > > ARM code to deliver the event on R/W/X traps. Finally, we > turn on the > > compilation of mem_access and mem_event on ARM and perform > the necessary > > changes to the tools side. > > > > This version of the series is based on master and each patch > in the series has > > been compile tested on both ARM and x86. > > based on master == no longer depends on the half of your > "memaccess > cleanups" series which didn't go in yet? > > > It didn't depend on the cleanup series, oh, I'd been assuming it did, oops. > but now that it is merged I did rebase v15 on staging. I'm just > waiting to get more feedback on v14 before I send it. OK, FWIW other than Julien's coding style stuff the only concern I have is the locking one I mentioned. Ian.