From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: make c-stubdom returns No rule to make target `mini-os-x86_64-c' Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:23:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1429179829.25195.61.camel@citrix.com> References: <5ED6894E-03C2-4B69-B8DB-80DD288FD034@supercoders.com.au> <20150416091033.GA13154@zion.uk.xensource.com> <21CFC4F5-6A8B-4193-AA75-0D479654326C@supercoders.com.au> <20150416101744.GC13154@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150416101744.GC13154@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: Andrew Stuart , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 11:17 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > Both solutions will require some work. I can't tell for sure how much > work is required. But I think we can safely(?) say that work done on rumpkernel will be a more worthwhile investment, while work on stubdom would be more of a sunk cost... Ian.