Re: Archiving Xen on ARM and PVOPS subprojects

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 17:23 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> 
> According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html we would need to
> perform an archivation review. In this case, the situation is quite
> clear IMHO and I believe that we do not need to make an extensive
> case, besides the one above. So my proposal would be to just have a
> committer vote on these. I would be happy if committers and
> maintainers listed in a), b) and
> http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html were to just
> reply with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread.

+1 to exorcising Xen ARM PV, it's just confusing and dead.

My personal inclination is also that the pvops project is "done" and I
would vote +1, but I don't really think it is up to me. If formally I am
needed to vote to get things done then I would vote with the majority
side of David, Konrad & Boris (who I believe are the 3 current Linux
maintainers).

Ian.