From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: Stepping down as maintainer (was Re: [PATCH for-next 0/9] mlx4 changes in virtual GID management) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:03:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1429221799.2980.488.camel@redhat.com> References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FC0120@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <1428858993.3470.12.camel@dworkin> <20150413164238.GB17521@obsidianresearch.com> <4EC214DA-97F8-4BCD-AEA6-6FB539E820F1@redhat.com> <20150414234258.GA25810@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <232BEA5DF26EF54583B8B332938DD0B84BB8E335@CMEXMB1.ad.emulex.com> <20150416201310.GA24838@obsidianresearch.com> <20150416213726.GA26437@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NOpsGevpIXWZO/iomf9r" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150416213726.GA26437-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Or Gerlitz , Pradeep Kankipati , "ira.weiny" , Yann Droneaud , "Hefty, Sean" , Roland Dreier , Hal Rosenstock , David Miller , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "talal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org" , Amir Vadai , Sagi Grimberg , Haggai Eran , Shachar Raindel List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org --=-NOpsGevpIXWZO/iomf9r Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:37 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > > >> Let=E2=80=99s take this as a starting point. If there are other pat= ches > > >> people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and > > >> I=E2=80=99ll add them for review and possible addition to the list. > > >> > > >> git://github.com/dledford/linux.git for-4.1 > > > > > > I noticed a few patches didn't get Reviewed-By's etc from the mailing > > > list annotated.. > >=20 > > Every patch need not have a Reviewed-By annotation, it's perfectly up > > to the maintainer judgement to make sure there was either consensus, >=20 > More clearly: There were several patches where a Reviewed-By/etc was > *provided* on-list but did not get captured in the git commit. Sure, that's what I figured you meant. That most likely means that I pulled the bundle from patchworks before their review was captured. It means I would need to either re-pull the bundle or manually add the review. > AFAIK, capturing provided tags is considered best practice as a way to > recognize and retain contributors. Agreed. I'll double check them tomorrow. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --=-NOpsGevpIXWZO/iomf9r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVMDGnAAoJELgmozMOVy/dm/kP/01avHo69m84Yxq45Hc4oP2X 4pRKSR1MtHcFbPm1E2expb8a1QoMH5fuJHXXEovW+Pr3CNUI7knnO+iCttcxUvBI XFkVIrr24RMa/A609SFAnYLAuO79fHgb8XkBsAVKhz+4/woxT5DXY+Ng2kInMteX mWYCA1ecw0M/EdNh+fbM4YqCCuW0UoU35upXg1bKxGn0zNb5cXvSABtK16c4my5S N2LNq1ME6/eVkhFGD1jBu4q4Y+MiRwda/RqqybtcdoKJRgCnHRup+C6mRO7R186Y XT9pGyLkMokJ5ZQpBx+shiPb59MYY+X/noLyte8KAwD+oVG6FYNYRJxW0AmSkyQX LNe3KfbVvfcn29EihW47LCClDJXv/MUJau3uRKcMNOfrTNRcZvtY/cyO929G/WQE lzArLhAFCfRluJ0hovOcc/PSAnXbPOKPjvoIsd+X5smOC54hiqgJyncWgpjjecJv 1EcWmjf3dYsQGvf84chhZLO5EuKbGX6dH/Kj0OfLnMy4EhPlns0Zt844Q4464eoz rBRTQEtxPsnNZXKL3YAmXi2FnJLccENb1qxGNI14EPrvCHUSY6cjkI1JrhRd5jQD GoxTMPBKFPxJSgUrnj4I8Dfs73h1CCeY4eDRz1W8K/EIKP1Bj+QHQm76G1EAzrLW 0bSRSL7qrcW7spqHqK0K =rtml -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NOpsGevpIXWZO/iomf9r-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html