From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] scsi: use host wide tags by default
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:42:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429306960.1079.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429301471-5666-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 22:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/53c700.c b/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> index 82abfce..941a424 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ NCR_700_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt,
> tpnt->slave_destroy = NCR_700_slave_destroy;
> tpnt->slave_alloc = NCR_700_slave_alloc;
> tpnt->change_queue_depth = NCR_700_change_queue_depth;
> - tpnt->use_blk_tags = 1;
>
> if(tpnt->name == NULL)
> tpnt->name = "53c700";
> @@ -1107,7 +1106,9 @@ process_script_interrupt(__u32 dsps, __u32 dsp, struct scsi_cmnd *SCp,
> BUG();
> }
> if(hostdata->msgin[1] == A_SIMPLE_TAG_MSG) {
> - struct scsi_cmnd *SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp, hostdata->msgin[2]);
> + struct scsi_cmnd *SCp;
> +
> + SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp->host, hostdata->msgin[2]);
This (and the following) is a stylistic modification and doesn't really
belong here.
> if(unlikely(SCp == NULL)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "scsi%d: (%d:%d) no saved request for tag %d\n",
> host->host_no, reselection_id, lun, hostdata->msgin[2]);
> @@ -1119,7 +1120,9 @@ process_script_interrupt(__u32 dsps, __u32 dsp, struct scsi_cmnd *SCp,
> "reselection is tag %d, slot %p(%d)\n",
> hostdata->msgin[2], slot, slot->tag);
> } else {
> - struct scsi_cmnd *SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp, SCSI_NO_TAG);
> + struct scsi_cmnd *SCp;
> +
> + SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp->host, SCSI_NO_TAG);
> if(unlikely(SCp == NULL)) {
> sdev_printk(KERN_ERR, SDp,
> "no saved request for untagged cmd\n");
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index 3833bf5..72a72f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -662,32 +662,14 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> */
> int scsi_change_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev, int depth)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - if (depth <= 0)
> - goto out;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> + if (depth > 0) {
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> - /*
> - * Check to see if the queue is managed by the block layer.
> - * If it is, and we fail to adjust the depth, exit.
> - *
> - * Do not resize the tag map if it is a host wide share bqt,
> - * because the size should be the hosts's can_queue. If there
> - * is more IO than the LLD's can_queue (so there are not enuogh
> - * tags) request_fn's host queue ready check will handle it.
> - */
> - if (!shost_use_blk_mq(sdev->host) && !sdev->host->bqt) {
> - if (blk_queue_tagged(sdev->request_queue) &&
> - blk_queue_resize_tags(sdev->request_queue, depth) != 0)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> + sdev->queue_depth = depth;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
This lock/unlock is a nasty global sync point which can be eliminated:
we can rely on the architectural atomicity of 32 bit writes (might need
to make sdev->queue_depth a u32 because I seem to remember 16 bit writes
had to be done as two byte stores on some architectures).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-17 20:11 [PATCH, RFC] scsi: use host wide tags by default Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 21:42 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2015-04-17 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 21:46 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 21:47 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 22:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 22:20 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-20 18:07 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-18 4:05 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-04-18 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429306960.1079.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.