From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] raisin: pass --with-system-seabios with seabios was built Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:25:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1429716352.30934.39.camel@citrix.com> References: <1429634897-14377-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1429695758.6604.5.camel@citrix.com> <5537AFBD.4030706@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, george.dunlap@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 15:49 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, George Dunlap wrote: > > Re stubdoms, I think that we should let the xen component do it until > > it's possible to do it out of tree (i.e., no regression in functionality). > > On the other hands current stubdoms are not even tested in osstest, so > we might as well wait for the next generation to be ready before having > them in raisin. They are at least build tested. And George's point about "no regression in functionality" (i.e. for users, not test systems) is a strong one. Unless you were suggesting to leave them to xen.git for now? Ian.