From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ben@decadent.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "dcache: Fix locking bugs in backported "deal with deadlock in d_walk()"" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143012117464186@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
dcache: Fix locking bugs in backported "deal with deadlock in d_walk()"
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
dcache-fix-locking-bugs-in-backported-deal-with-deadlock-in-d_walk.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 20defcec264ceab2630356fb9d397f3d237b5e6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:16:35 +0000
Subject: dcache: Fix locking bugs in backported "deal with deadlock in d_walk()"
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 20defcec264ceab2630356fb9d397f3d237b5e6d upstream in 3.2-stable
Steven Rostedt reported:
> Porting -rt to the latest 3.2 stable tree I triggered this bug:
>
> =====================================
> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> -------------------------------------
> rm/1638 is trying to release lock (rcu_read_lock) at:
> [<c04fde6c>] rcu_read_unlock+0x0/0x23
> but there are no more locks to release!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by rm/1638:
> #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04f93eb>] do_rmdir+0x5f/0xd2
> #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04f9329>] vfs_rmdir+0x49/0xac
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 1638, comm: rm Not tainted 3.2.66-test-rt96+ #2
> Call Trace:
> [<c083f390>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f
> [<c0463cdf>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xc3/0xcd
> [<c04653a8>] lock_release_non_nested+0x98/0x1ec
> [<c046228d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x18/0x90
> [<c0456f1c>] ? local_clock+0x2d/0x50
> [<c04fde6c>] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
> [<c04fde6c>] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
> [<c046568e>] lock_release+0x192/0x1ad
> [<c04fde83>] rcu_read_unlock+0x17/0x23
> [<c04ff344>] shrink_dcache_parent+0x227/0x270
> [<c04f9348>] vfs_rmdir+0x68/0xac
> [<c04f9424>] do_rmdir+0x98/0xd2
> [<c04f03ad>] ? fput+0x1a3/0x1ab
> [<c084dd42>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x1a
> [<c0465b58>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x118/0x149
> [<c04fa3e0>] sys_unlinkat+0x2b/0x35
> [<c084dd13>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x12
>
>
>
>
> There's a path to calling rcu_read_unlock() without calling
> rcu_read_lock() in have_submounts().
>
> goto positive;
>
> positive:
> if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
> goto rename_retry;
>
> rename_retry:
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> in the above path, rcu_read_lock() is never done before calling
> rcu_read_unlock();
I reviewed locking contexts in all three functions that I changed when
backporting "deal with deadlock in d_walk()". It's actually worse
than this:
- We don't hold this_parent->d_lock at the 'positive' label in
have_submounts(), but it is unlocked after 'rename_retry'.
- There is an rcu_read_unlock() after the 'out' label in
select_parent(), but it's not held at the 'goto out'.
Fix all three lock imbalances.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/dcache.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ ascend:
return 0; /* No mount points found in tree */
positive:
if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
- goto rename_retry;
+ goto rename_retry_unlocked;
if (locked)
write_sequnlock(&rename_lock);
return 1;
@@ -1082,6 +1082,7 @@ rename_retry:
rcu_read_unlock();
if (locked)
goto again;
+rename_retry_unlocked:
locked = 1;
write_seqlock(&rename_lock);
goto again;
@@ -1146,6 +1147,7 @@ resume:
*/
if (found && need_resched()) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
goto out;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ben@decadent.org.uk are
queue-3.10/move-d_rcu-from-overlapping-d_child-to-overlapping-d_alias.patch
queue-3.10/deal-with-deadlock-in-d_walk.patch
queue-3.10/dcache-fix-locking-bugs-in-backported-deal-with-deadlock-in-d_walk.patch
queue-3.10/splice-apply-generic-position-and-size-checks-to-each-write.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-04-27 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143012117464186@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.