From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.242.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3SNsLC2019581 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:56:45 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp01.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:23:40 +0530 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by d28dlp03.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE7C125805A for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:25:37 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t3SNrZ8c46203122 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:23:35 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t3SNrYpd031661 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 05:23:35 +0530 Message-ID: <1430265211.2218.13.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux patches for 4.1 From: Mimi Zohar To: James Morris Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:53:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <1978116.cNUKEOv2T8@sifl> <14c8ec61728.2806.85c95baa4474aabc7814e68940a78392@paul-moore.com> <47618041.M4z7H003Sc@sifl> <553A6D3D.8020904@schaufler-ca.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: "Security-Enhanced Linux \(SELinux\) mailing list" List-Post: List-Help: On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:28 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > James, do you suppose you could send an announcement when you > > > do your merge? That would make it easier on the sub-tree maintainers. > > > Just a quick "I merged the next branch to XXXX" to the LSM list. > > > > That would definitely make my life a little easier. > > Ok, sure. After posting the integrity patches here, I tried applying them to Linus' 4.1.0-rc1 branch to make sure they'll apply cleanly. Looks like commit c6f439d "VFS: security/: d_backing_inode() annotations" affects all of the security subsystems. Mimi