Patch "Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-fix-inode-eviction-infinite-loop-after-cloning-into-it.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From ccccf3d67294714af2d72a6fd6fd7d73b01c9329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:23:59 +0100
Subject: Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

commit ccccf3d67294714af2d72a6fd6fd7d73b01c9329 upstream.

If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
following warning:

[ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
[ 3914.638636]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3914.639620]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3914.640789]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.642041]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3914.643236]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.644441]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3914.645711]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3914.646914]  [<ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3914.648058]  [<ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3914.650105]  [<ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
[ 3914.651361]  [<ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 3914.652761]  [<ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
[ 3914.654128]  [<ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[ 3914.655320]  [<ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---

This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
keeps dumping the following warning over and over:

[ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
[ 3915.137913]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3915.139154]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3915.140316]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.141505]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3915.142709]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.143849]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3915.145120]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 3915.146352]  [<ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 3915.147565]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3915.148785]  [<ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3915.149931]  [<ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
[ 3915.151154]  [<ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 3915.152094]  [<ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
[ 3915.153081]  [<ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
[ 3915.154062]  [<ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
[ 3915.155193]  [<ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 3915.156274]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---

So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
(same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).

This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
made for fstests:

  mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
  mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT

  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
  umount $SCRATCH_MNT

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -3226,6 +3226,11 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(s
 	if (off + len == src->i_size)
 		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, bs) - off;
 
+	if (len == 0) {
+		ret = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	/* verify the end result is block aligned */
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(off, bs) || !IS_ALIGNED(off + len, bs) ||
 	    !IS_ALIGNED(destoff, bs))


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fdmanana@suse.com are

queue-3.14/btrfs-fix-log-tree-corruption-when-fs-mounted-with-o-discard.patch
queue-3.14/btrfs-fix-inode-eviction-infinite-loop-after-extent_same-ioctl.patch
queue-3.14/btrfs-fix-inode-eviction-infinite-loop-after-cloning-into-it.patch