From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: [PATCH] package: Fix license exclusion packaging errors
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:23:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430313794.19130.15.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
Currently the license exclusion code removes packages from PACKAGES
pre population of the package directories. This means that the FILES
entries for some packages are not seen and invariably results in
packaging errors.
Instead, remove the packages from PACKAGES post population of the packages
so the usual FILES entries work as expected but the file are not placed
into any packages and no packages containing embargoed licenses are generated.
This avoids errors from gcc-runtime with GPLv3 exclusion like:
ERROR: QA Issue: gcc-runtime: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
/usr/share
/usr/src
/usr/share/gcc-4.9.2
/usr/share/gcc-4.9.2/python
Please set FILES such that these items are packaged. Alternatively if they are unneeded, avoid installing them or delete them within do_install. [installed-vs-shipped]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index 5ece69e..a76e6e9 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -1041,14 +1041,11 @@ python populate_packages () {
bb.utils.mkdirhier(outdir)
os.chdir(dvar)
- # Sanity check PACKAGES for duplicates and for LICENSE_EXCLUSION
+ # Sanity check PACKAGES for duplicates
# Sanity should be moved to sanity.bbclass once we have the infrastucture
package_list = []
for pkg in packages.split():
- if d.getVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + pkg, True):
- msg = "%s has an incompatible license. Excluding from packaging." % pkg
- package_qa_handle_error("incompatible-license", msg, d)
if pkg in package_list:
msg = "%s is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors." % pkg
package_qa_handle_error("packages-list", msg, d)
@@ -1082,9 +1079,6 @@ python populate_packages () {
continue
seen.append(file)
- if d.getVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + pkg, True):
- continue
-
def mkdir(src, dest, p):
src = os.path.join(src, p)
dest = os.path.join(dest, p)
@@ -1125,6 +1119,16 @@ python populate_packages () {
os.umask(oldumask)
os.chdir(workdir)
+ # Handle LICENSE_EXCLUSION
+ package_list = []
+ for pkg in packages.split():
+ if d.getVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + pkg, True):
+ msg = "%s has an incompatible license. Excluding from packaging." % pkg
+ package_qa_handle_error("incompatible-license", msg, d)
+ else:
+ package_list.append(pkg)
+ d.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(package_list))
+
unshipped = []
for root, dirs, files in cpath.walk(dvar):
dir = root[len(dvar):]
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 13:23 Richard Purdie [this message]
2015-04-29 15:42 ` [PATCH] package: Fix license exclusion packaging errors Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430313794.19130.15.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.