From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: 32-bit ARM guest on 64-bit ARM Xen Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 13:48:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1430484502.15640.25.camel@citrix.com> References: <553FDC2B.1050306@dornerworks.com> <553FEA2F.6050306@citrix.com> <55410519.4020009@dornerworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YoAMs-0003Zj-BW for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:48:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55410519.4020009@dornerworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Robert VanVossen Cc: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 12:21 -0400, Robert VanVossen wrote: > This yields xen/xen/arch/arm/domain.c:208 which has the following line: > > WRITE_SYSREG32(n->arch.teecr, TEECR32_EL1); This is in a "if ( is_32bit_domain(p->domain) && cpu_has_thumbee )" condition, so if it isn't a 32-bit model issue it might be a ThumbEE one? Ian.