From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: michael@gernoth.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tiwai@suse.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ALSA: emu10k1: don't deadlock in proc-functions" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 15:23:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143057301320113@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ALSA: emu10k1: don't deadlock in proc-functions
to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
alsa-emu10k1-don-t-deadlock-in-proc-functions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 91bf0c2dcb935a87e5c0795f5047456b965fd143 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Gernoth <michael@gernoth.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:42:15 +0200
Subject: ALSA: emu10k1: don't deadlock in proc-functions
From: Michael Gernoth <michael@gernoth.net>
commit 91bf0c2dcb935a87e5c0795f5047456b965fd143 upstream.
The functions snd_emu10k1_proc_spdif_read and snd_emu1010_fpga_read
acquire the emu_lock before accessing the FPGA. The function used
to access the FPGA (snd_emu1010_fpga_read) also tries to take
the emu_lock which causes a deadlock.
Remove the outer locking in the proc-functions (guarding only the
already safe fpga read) to prevent this deadlock.
[removed superfluous flags variables too -- tiwai]
Signed-off-by: Michael Gernoth <michael@gernoth.net>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c
+++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emuproc.c
@@ -241,31 +241,22 @@ static void snd_emu10k1_proc_spdif_read(
struct snd_emu10k1 *emu = entry->private_data;
u32 value;
u32 value2;
- unsigned long flags;
u32 rate;
if (emu->card_capabilities->emu_model) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x38, &value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
if ((value & 0x1) == 0) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x2a, &value);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x2b, &value2);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
rate = 0x1770000 / (((value << 5) | value2)+1);
snd_iprintf(buffer, "ADAT Locked : %u\n", rate);
} else {
snd_iprintf(buffer, "ADAT Unlocked\n");
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x20, &value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
if ((value & 0x4) == 0) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x28, &value);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, 0x29, &value2);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
rate = 0x1770000 / (((value << 5) | value2)+1);
snd_iprintf(buffer, "SPDIF Locked : %d\n", rate);
} else {
@@ -410,14 +401,11 @@ static void snd_emu_proc_emu1010_reg_rea
{
struct snd_emu10k1 *emu = entry->private_data;
u32 value;
- unsigned long flags;
int i;
snd_iprintf(buffer, "EMU1010 Registers:\n\n");
for(i = 0; i < 0x40; i+=1) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_emu1010_fpga_read(emu, i, &value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->emu_lock, flags);
snd_iprintf(buffer, "%02X: %08X, %02X\n", i, value, (value >> 8) & 0x7f);
}
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from michael@gernoth.net are
queue-4.0/alsa-emu10k1-don-t-deadlock-in-proc-functions.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-05-02 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143057301320113@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=michael@gernoth.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.