All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: get_maintainers.pl is rude, was Re: [PATCH 05/19] USB: inode.c: move assignment out of if () block
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 06:52:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430574739.23252.5.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430125403.GA22948@lst.de>

On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:54 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Joe, can you please fix your bloody script to not report me for every
> goddamnt file I touched once?

For files that have no specific maintainer, the
default period for reporting commit sign-offs and
authors as possible interested parties in a patch is
1 year.

And given how little my sweet wife likes me when I
swear around her, I'm not inclined to do that
specifically for you, no.

> Authorship of changes to a file is
> a completely wrong metric..

That was Andrew Morton's idea.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/17/460

> I can see the point to guess it by
> non-maintainer signoffs, but authorship is plain wrong and highly
> annoying.

That's an assertion, but you've neglected to give
a rationale for it.  I think authorship is quite a
good reason to be cc'd on something as given that
you've spent the effort to originate code, you're
also quite likely to be interested in patches for
that code.

> If you're unwilling to fix this please at least add a get_maintainers.ignore
> file and add me as the first entry.  Thanks!

If a get_maintainers.ignore file is created,
(which seems like a reasonable idea, thanks),
I'm not maintaining it.

Maybe this: (if you create a .get_maintainer.ignore file
with your name in it like)

$ cat .get_maintainer.ignore
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
$
---
 scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
index d701627..fc169fd 100755
--- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
+++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
@@ -186,6 +186,27 @@ if (-f $conf) {
     unshift(@ARGV, @conf_args) if @conf_args;
 }
 
+my @ignore_emails = ();
+my $ignore_file = which_conf(".get_maintainer.ignore");
+if (-f $ignore_file) {
+    open(my $ignore, '<', "$ignore_file")
+	or warn "$P: Can't find a readable .get_maintainer.ignore file $!\n";
+    while (<$ignore>) {
+	my $line = $_;
+
+	$line =~ s/\s*\n?$//;
+	$line =~ s/^\s*//;
+	$line =~ s/\s+$//;
+	$line =~ s/#.*$//;
+
+	next if ($line =~ m/^\s*$/);
+	if (rfc822_valid($line)) {
+	    push(@ignore_emails, $line);
+	}
+    }
+    close($ignore);
+}
+
 if (!GetOptions(
 		'email!' => \$email,
 		'git!' => \$email_git,
@@ -513,6 +534,16 @@ if ($web) {
 
 exit($exit);
 
+sub ignore_email_address {
+    my ($address) = @_;
+
+    foreach my $ignore (@ignore_emails) {
+	return 1 if ($ignore eq $address);
+    }
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
 sub range_is_maintained {
     my ($start, $end) = @_;
 
@@ -1868,6 +1899,7 @@ sub vcs_assign {
 	my $percent = $sign_offs * 100 / $divisor;
 
 	$percent = 100 if ($percent > 100);
+	next if (ignore_email_address($line));
 	$count++;
 	last if ($sign_offs < $email_git_min_signatures ||
 		 $count > $email_git_max_maintainers ||





  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-02 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1430386388-15462-1-git-send-email-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
     [not found] ` <1430386388-15462-5-git-send-email-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
     [not found]   ` <20150430093608.GA18432@lst.de>
     [not found]     ` <20150430124004.GA17070@kroah.com>
2015-04-30 12:54       ` get_maintainers.pl is rude, was Re: [PATCH 05/19] USB: inode.c: move assignment out of if () block Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-02 11:16         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2015-05-02 13:52         ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-05-05 15:38           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-05 16:32             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1430574739.23252.5.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.