From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: calvinowens@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mgalbraith@suse.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 19:44:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <143058869210962@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ksoftirqd-enable-irqs-and-call-cond_resched-before-poking-rcu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 28423ad283d5348793b0c45cc9b1af058e776fd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:16:18 -0800
Subject: ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
commit 28423ad283d5348793b0c45cc9b1af058e776fd6 upstream.
While debugging an issue with excessive softirq usage, I encountered the
following note in commit 3e339b5dae24a706 ("softirq: Use hotplug thread
infrastructure"):
[ paulmck: Call rcu_note_context_switch() with interrupts enabled. ]
...but despite this note, the patch still calls RCU with IRQs disabled.
This seemingly innocuous change caused a significant regression in softirq
CPU usage on the sending side of a large TCP transfer (~1 GB/s): when
introducing 0.01% packet loss, the softirq usage would jump to around 25%,
spiking as high as 50%. Before the change, the usage would never exceed 5%.
Moving the call to rcu_note_context_switch() after the cond_sched() call,
as it was originally before the hotplug patch, completely eliminated this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -774,9 +774,13 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int c
local_irq_disable();
if (local_softirq_pending()) {
__do_softirq();
- rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
local_irq_enable();
cond_resched();
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
+ preempt_enable();
+
return;
}
local_irq_enable();
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from calvinowens@fb.com are
queue-3.10/ksoftirqd-enable-irqs-and-call-cond_resched-before-poking-rcu.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-05-02 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=143058869210962@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.