All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@plumgrid.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ebpf: verifier: check that call reg with ARG_ANYTHING is initialized" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 20:16:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143059057713176@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ebpf: verifier: check that call reg with ARG_ANYTHING is initialized

to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ebpf-verifier-check-that-call-reg-with-arg_anything-is-initialized.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 80f1d68ccba70b1060c9c7360ca83da430f66bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:21:42 +0100
Subject: ebpf: verifier: check that call reg with ARG_ANYTHING is initialized

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit 80f1d68ccba70b1060c9c7360ca83da430f66bed upstream.

I noticed that a helper function with argument type ARG_ANYTHING does
not need to have an initialized value (register).

This can worst case lead to unintented stack memory leakage in future
helper functions if they are not carefully designed, or unintended
application behaviour in case the application developer was not careful
enough to match a correct helper function signature in the API.

The underlying issue is that ARG_ANYTHING should actually be split
into two different semantics:

  1) ARG_DONTCARE for function arguments that the helper function
     does not care about (in other words: the default for unused
     function arguments), and

  2) ARG_ANYTHING that is an argument actually being used by a
     helper function and *guaranteed* to be an initialized register.

The current risk is low: ARG_ANYTHING is only used for the 'flags'
argument (r4) in bpf_map_update_elem() that internally does strict
checking.

Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |    4 +++-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_get(struct fd f)
 
 /* function argument constraints */
 enum bpf_arg_type {
-	ARG_ANYTHING = 0,	/* any argument is ok */
+	ARG_DONTCARE = 0,	/* unused argument in helper function */
 
 	/* the following constraints used to prototype
 	 * bpf_map_lookup/update/delete_elem() functions
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
 	 */
 	ARG_PTR_TO_STACK,	/* any pointer to eBPF program stack */
 	ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE,	/* number of bytes accessed from stack */
+
+	ARG_ANYTHING,		/* any (initialized) argument is ok */
 };
 
 /* type of values returned from helper functions */
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifie
 	enum bpf_reg_type expected_type;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING)
+	if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (reg->type == NOT_INIT) {
@@ -763,6 +763,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifie
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
+	if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_STACK || arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY ||
 	    arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
 		expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are

queue-4.0/ebpf-verifier-check-that-call-reg-with-arg_anything-is-initialized.patch
queue-4.0/lib-memzero_explicit-use-barrier-instead-of-optimizer_hide_var.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-05-02 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143059057713176@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.