Re: (release) versioning

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]

On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:54 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.05.15 at 01:15, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Well, if we decide to keep the -rcX, then the 3rd digit will be:
> >  - always .0 for actual releases
> >  - always the same as -rc* for RCs
> > 
> > so it looks to me that we can just kill it and have:
> > 
> >  5.0-unstable
> >    5.1-rc1
> >    5.1-rc2
> >    ...
> >    5.1-rcN
> >  5.1
> >    5.2-rc1
> >    ...
> >  5.3
> 
> No, that would break sortability on solely the number part again. 
>
Yeah, I see.

> Did
> you look at IanC's adjustment proposal (dropping just the redundant
> number, i.e. 5.0.1-rc)?
>
Just now, and I like it, as it is non-redundant as well.

Dario

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel