From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: (release) versioning
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 14:45:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1430916312.4957.48.camel@citrix.com>
References: <554903B90200007800076CFC@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5548F848.2010701@citrix.com> <1430867725.5415.91.camel@citrix.com>
	<554A1D0602000078000771AC@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8486473829285836034=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>) id 1Ypyhc-0003JD-El
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 12:45:28 +0000
In-Reply-To: <554A1D0602000078000771AC@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============8486473829285836034==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WFKyFHYWuD98rzUFwfIz"

--=-WFKyFHYWuD98rzUFwfIz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:54 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.05.15 at 01:15, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Well, if we decide to keep the -rcX, then the 3rd digit will be:
> >  - always .0 for actual releases
> >  - always the same as -rc* for RCs
> >=20
> > so it looks to me that we can just kill it and have:
> >=20
> >  5.0-unstable
> >    5.1-rc1
> >    5.1-rc2
> >    ...
> >    5.1-rcN
> >  5.1
> >    5.2-rc1
> >    ...
> >  5.3
>=20
> No, that would break sortability on solely the number part again.=20
>
Yeah, I see.

> Did
> you look at IanC's adjustment proposal (dropping just the redundant
> number, i.e. 5.0.1-rc)?
>
Just now, and I like it, as it is non-redundant as well.

Dario

--=-WFKyFHYWuD98rzUFwfIz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlVKDNgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRb7wCgisC6jSokGuU+Qit5q8/qEZCK
ov4AoISMCwA/zOaUSoy1SrJraoy9nGko
=FeZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-WFKyFHYWuD98rzUFwfIz--


--===============8486473829285836034==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============8486473829285836034==--