From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 366CBE0098A; Fri, 8 May 2015 06:52:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113C3E0097D for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 06:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t48DqmUP015284; Fri, 8 May 2015 14:52:48 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3cKYzfrhgZUu; Fri, 8 May 2015 14:52:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t48DqYZn015274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 8 May 2015 14:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1431093153.8074.291.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: "Damian, Alexandru" Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 14:52:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "toaster@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: toaster automated testing X-BeenThere: toaster@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Web based interface for BitBake List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:52:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:47 +0100, Damian, Alexandru wrote: > I've been progressing a bit on the automated Toaster testing. We need > to get this step in a reasonable shape in order to help with the > massive refactoring that we planned for 1.9 M1. > > As part of this effort, I moved the existing automated UI testing from > a poky-branch to yocto-TTS, as it stand no chance for successful > merging upstream in Poky. Why wouldn't we want to merge automated tests for toaster somewhere like bitbake? Cheers, Richard