From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <1431096753.4957.98.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4926111177173160662=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>) id 1Yqjdp-0003Do-7U
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 14:52:41 +0000
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, "Studer, Nathan C" <nathan.c.studer@delphi.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============4926111177173160662==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UFuDTX4qFPcZUktweirY"

--=-UFuDTX4qFPcZUktweirY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey guys,

I just noticed that the ARINC653 scheduler record in MAINTAINERS reads
as follows:

ARINC653 SCHEDULER
M:      Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
M:      Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
S:      Supported
F:      xen/common/sched_arinc653.c
F:      tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c

Is that still accurate? I'm especially referring to Nate's commitment
and e-mail address.

If yes, sorry for the noise. If no, you should send a patch to update
it.

No pressure, of course, it's just that I run over it and thought it was
worth double checking! :-)

Regards,
Dario

--=-UFuDTX4qFPcZUktweirY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlVMzbEACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQPvgCcC6+Ra/505NWH1NQLA6CUDUlt
E38AnixVb4dPn5BdeB8hl33AXRYCrWxh
=6Gw4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UFuDTX4qFPcZUktweirY--


--===============4926111177173160662==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============4926111177173160662==--