From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>
Cc: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>,
wei.liu2@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, jbeulich@suse.com,
dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:56:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431338189.8979.5.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431018326-3239-1-git-send-email-chong.li@wustl.edu>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1885 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 12:05 -0500, Chong Li wrote:
> [Goal]
> The current xl sched-rtds tool can only set the VCPUs of a domain to the same parameter
> although the scheduler supports VCPUs with different parameters. This patchset is to
> enable xl sched-rtds tool to configure the VCPUs of a domain with different parameters.
>
> This per-VCPU settings can be used in many scenarios. For example, based on Dario's statement in our pervious discussion(http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg00423.html), if there are two real-time applications, which have different timing requirements, running in a multi-VCPU guest domain, it is beneficial to pin these two applications to two seperate VCPUs with different scheduling parameters.
>
Right. And in fact, I'm glad to see this is happening, thanks for doing
this work! :-)
> 1) show the budget and period of each VCPU of each domain, by using "xl sched-rtds" command. An example would be like:
>
> [..]
>
> 2) show the budget and period of each VCPU of a specific domain, by using,
> e.g., "xl sched-rtds -d vm1" command. The output would be like:
>
> [..]
>
> 3) set the budget and period of each VCPU of a specific domain, by using,
> e.g., "xl sched-rtds -d vm1 -v 0 -p 100 -b 50" command (where "-v 0" specifies
> the VCPU with ID=0). The parameters would be like:
>
> [..]
>
> 4) Users can still set the per-domain parameters (previous xl rtds tool already supported this).
> e.g., "xl sched-rtds -d vm1 -p 500 -b 250". The parameters would be like:
>
The CLI looks nice to me. I'm wondering, what happens if the user tries
to only alter the budget or the period of a vcpu (or of a domain)? I
think that is not possible right now, is it?
Would it make sense to allow that? I think it would, but this can well
happen later, once we will have this in.
Regards,
Dario
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 17:05 [PATCH v1 0/4] Enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler Chong Li
2015-05-07 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] xen: enabling " Chong Li
2015-05-08 7:49 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-10 22:04 ` Chong Li
2015-05-11 6:57 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14 22:27 ` Chong Li
2015-05-15 14:42 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-11 13:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-14 22:15 ` Chong Li
2015-05-07 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] libxc: " Chong Li
2015-05-11 13:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-07 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] libxl: " Chong Li
2015-05-11 14:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-15 15:24 ` Chong Li
2015-05-15 23:09 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-12 10:01 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-15 16:35 ` Chong Li
2015-05-15 23:02 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-22 17:57 ` Chong Li
2015-05-07 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] xl: " Chong Li
2015-05-14 14:24 ` Meng Xu
2015-05-14 14:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-05-14 14:43 ` Meng Xu
2015-05-11 9:56 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2015-05-14 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Enabling " Chong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431338189.8979.5.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=chong.li@wustl.edu \
--cc=dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=lichong659@gmail.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.