From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 53884: regressions - FAIL
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:50:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1431341450.8263.17.camel@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-53884-mainreport@xen.org>
	<55507FB50200007800078C01@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5550646D.1010502@citrix.com>
	<555082200200007800078C1C@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<555085480200007800078C30@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<1431335126.2660.571.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>) id 1YrlJ1-0003kR-KS
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:51:27 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1431335126.2660.571.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:05 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:32 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> > > While it'd be really nice to do so, the flight here didn't test the tip of
> > > staging (onto which I'll push the revert in a few minutes), so a force
> > > push may be a little difficult to arrange. I'm also afraid that doing so
> > > would yield the XSM build failure an allowable one going forward.
> > > Otoh, considering that we got two almost-pushes recently, I'm quite
> > > hopeful that we'll get a real push pretty soon.
> > 
> > And sadly 6ea9f0481e ("xen: guestcopy: Provide an helper to
> > safely copy string from guest") breaks the x86 XSM build too (due
> > to type issues with the compat mode layer of flask's hypercall
> > handling). Reverting that one would be more cumbersome (as I
> > suppose subsequent changes depend on it), but I very much
> > hope that you, Julien, will provide a timely fix for this.
> 
> Yes, please.
> 
> There's no point my killing 55228 until then.

I've applied Julien's fix and killed this flight.