Re: [libvirt test] 55257: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:36 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 12:46 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
> >   
> >> flight 55257 libvirt real [real]
> >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/55257/
> >>
> >> Regressions :-(
> >>
> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> including tests which could not be run:
> >>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt     11 guest-start               fail REGR. vs. 53854
> >>     
> >
> > I fear this may be a new heisenbug.
> >
> > I fear a heisenbug because flight 53854 passed and there is only one
> > more, completely unrelated change here.
> >
> > I saw something similar in
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53721/ which was an
> > osstest flight against itself (so not posted to the list). That one had:
> >   
> >>  test-amd64-i386-libvirt      11 guest-start               fail REGR. vs. 53073
> >>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt     11 guest-start               fail REGR. vs. 53073
> >>     
> >
> > In that case the range of libvirt was more useful than the one commit
> > here. It was 225aa80246d5..63a368012df, FWIW. Being a heisenbug I'm not
> > sure if 225aa80246d5 was OK or not
> >   
> 
> 225aa80246d5 only touches the qemu driver and should not affect Xen.

I meant the state of the tree at that point rather than that commit
itself.

Ian.