From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [libvirt test] 55257: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1431363751.8263.80.camel@citrix.com> References: <1431350527.8263.64.camel@citrix.com> <5550DA91.4050101@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5550DA91.4050101@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jim Fehlig Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:36 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 12:46 +0000, osstest service user wrote: > > > >> flight 55257 libvirt real [real] > >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/55257/ > >> > >> Regressions :-( > >> > >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > >> including tests which could not be run: > >> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 53854 > >> > > > > I fear this may be a new heisenbug. > > > > I fear a heisenbug because flight 53854 passed and there is only one > > more, completely unrelated change here. > > > > I saw something similar in > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53721/ which was an > > osstest flight against itself (so not posted to the list). That one had: > > > >> test-amd64-i386-libvirt 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 53073 > >> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 53073 > >> > > > > In that case the range of libvirt was more useful than the one commit > > here. It was 225aa80246d5..63a368012df, FWIW. Being a heisenbug I'm not > > sure if 225aa80246d5 was OK or not > > > > 225aa80246d5 only touches the qemu driver and should not affect Xen. I meant the state of the tree at that point rather than that commit itself. Ian.