Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix http deadlock on giant ref negotiations

[Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>]

On vr, 2015-05-15 at 04:38 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:41:20AM +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> 
> > > I have no clue how to write a test that would trigger this reliably
> > > without requiring a gigantic test fixture. However, I did confirm that
> > > it fixes the problem on the chromium case you provided (which otherwise
> > > deadlocks reliably for me).
> > 
> > This looks similar to the failure I posted about alst year in
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/258514
> > 
> > Though the issue is different, it has the same 'hanging git fetch'
> > symptom due to the deadlock between upload-pack and http-backend.
> 
> Thanks, I think it is the same issue (in the end I was replicating not
> with `--reference`, but just by doing a fetch from the other
> repository). And our solutions are essentially the same. I do prefer
> mine because:
> 
>   1. It keeps the buffering logic in http-backend; the half-duplex
>      nature is an http detail.
> 
>   2. I think it's better to buffer the request rather than the response,
>      for the reasons I stated in the commit message.
> 
> > The patch I sent back then is suboptimal, as it can cause larger packs
> > than necessary (we still use it though, as the alternative is a
> > non-working git), but it does include a test you may be able to use to
> > verify your fix, if this is indeed the same issue.
> 
> I applied the test from your patch, but couldn't get it to fail even
> with stock git.  The test above it shrunk a bit, but I was able to tweak
> yours to generate tags from 2001..100000, which I thought would have
> worked.  I suspect it's something silly like the size not being quite
> big enough for the pipe buffer on my system, or something like that.
> Though I couldn't get it to fail even with 200,000 tags, so perhaps it's
> something else.

The shrinkage in the test above it will actually work around the issue,
as there are now fewer already-fetched tags to negotiate. Either
reverting that shrinkage or executing the new test twice should do the
trick.
-- 
Dennis Kaarsemaker
http://www.kaarsemaker.net