Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] libxl: enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 11:35 -0500, Chong Li wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Dario Faggioli
> <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > I mean, a call to libxl_domain_sched_params_set() can be interpreted
> > like 'set the passed params for all the vcpus', _get(), I don't know...
> > perhaps it should return some sort of ERROR_INVAL, to inform the caller
> > that it is libxl_vcpu_sched_params_get() that should be used?
> >
> > Again, tools maintainers? :-)
> >
> Hi, Dario,
> 
> Yes. To be consistent with the hypervisor interface (seperate per-dom
> and per-vcpu data
> structures), this idea seems better.
> 
Just allow me to note that hypervisor's and tools' are different
interfaces, so they don't necessarily have to match.

So, yes, if you like my idea/proposal, then fine, but I just wanted to
point out as clearly as possible that I wasn't implying or asking that
it should be the same as Xen interface... Of course, it happens quite a
few time that the interfaces match, which is fine too, it just should
not be treated as a goal! :-)

> I can do it quick after getting feedbacks from tools maintainers.
> 
Exactly, let's hear from them first.

Regards,
Dario

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel